SOCIAL HARMONY
It is painful to see in any multi-religious, multi-cultural
and multi-lingual society a kind of social
disharmony which has no
rationale. God has given us one sun, one moon, one sky and one earth and all
the human beings have similar physical and mental structures. Their emotions, feelings and aspirations are
also similar. If faiths are different, they are for the purpose of variety, not
for mutual strife and hatred. At best they aim at unity in diversity. None of
them becomes superior by breeding hatred for the followers of a different faith
which, in fact, is only superficially different. At bottom, all faiths, like
all rivers, flow towards the same spiritual ocean. Emperor Akbar the Great
rightly said that ‘there are sensible men in all religions, and abstemious
thinkers and men endowed with miraculous powers among all nations. Each person,
according to his condition, gives the supreme being a name, but in reality to
name the unknowable is vain.’
According to American physicist and Nobel Prize Winner, Robert
Andrews Millikan (1868-1953) the change from the individual life of ever-expanding
complexity as our scientific civilization advances, would obviously be impossible
unless the individual learned in ever-increasing measure to subordinate his
impulses and interests to the furtherance of the group life.
But the question is who teaches the individual to subordinate
his impulses and interests to the furtherance of the group life. The answer is the
enlightened souls like great poets writers, statesmen and spiritual leaders
whose thoughts and ideas have a long-lasting impact.
Given below are three extracts which inspire the readers to shun
social discrimination and embrace all-inclusive unity.
FIRST EXTRACT:
The concluding lines of a narrative poem ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’ written
by the English poet S.T.Coleridge in 1798:
O Wedding
Guest! This soul hath been
Alone n a
wide wide sea:
So lonely ‘twas,
that God himself
Scarce
seemed there to be….
Farewell, farewell!
But this I tell
To thee,
thou Wedding Guest!
He prayeth
well, who loveth well
Both man and
bird and beast.
He prayeth
best, who loveth best
All things
both great and small;
For the dear
God who loved us,
He made and
loveth all.”
THE
SECOND EXTRACT
Is a speech
by Shylock, a Jew, who is otherwise a despised business man. It is taken from
Shakespeare’s play ‘The Merchant of Venice’ (Act III, Scene I). Shakespeare’s
purpose here is to create sympathy against the unfair treatment meted out to
the Jews by the Christians.
“He
(Antonio, his Christian rival) hath disgraced me and hindered me half a
million, laughed at my losses, mocked at my gains, scorned my nation, thwarted
my bargains, cooled my friends, heated my enemies, and what’s his reason? I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes?
Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons,
subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by
the same winter and summer as Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If
you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you
wrong us, shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble
you in that. If a Jew wrong a Christian, what is his humility? Revenge. If a
Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why,
revenge! The villainy you teach me I will execute, and I shall go hard but I will
better the instruction. ”
THE THIRD
EXTRACT
IS BAHA’U’LLAH’S
ADVICE TO HIS APOSTLES:
‘O Children
of Baha! Have intercourse with all the peoples of the world, with the disciples
of all religions in the spirit of complete joyfulness. Remind them of what is good for them all, but
beware of making the word of God the stumbling block of friction or the source
of mutual hatred. If ye know what the
other does not know, tell him, with the tongue of friendliness and love. If he
accepts it and takes it up, then the aims has been attained, if he rejects it,
pray for him and leave him to himself,; ye may ever importune him’. (Quoted by Dr.S.Radhakrishnan in Eastern
Religions And Western Thought, OUP 1939, Page 340.)
In the book referred to above, Dr, S. RadhaKrishnan holds
that Dara Shikoh , the eldest son of
Shah Jahan, is the author of a treatise designed to prove
that the differences between
Hindu and Muslim were matters only of language and expression. Kabir, Nanak,
Dadu, and a host of others point to a blend of Hindu and Muslim religious
doctrines. Bahaism stands up for a free religious fellowship.
30th
April 2020 G.
R. KANWAL